If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Bali: POV. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Bali: POV paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Bali: POV, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Bali: POV paper at affordable prices!
The Red Cross' bombing bombshell
The Red Cross' handling of the Bali Funds served to
undermine what could have been a key moment in
the Australian people's attitude to giving.
Help with essay on Bali: POV
October the 1th 00 saw the most direct and aggressive terrorist attack on Australia ever. For days after the now infamous Bali Bombing, Australian television screens were littered with images of brothers and sisters and mothers and fathers being pulled out of wreckage, bearing injuries that they will live with forever. These images touched something deep within the Australian psyche because in the two weeks following the atrocious attacks, the benevolent members of our community donated over $14 million to the Red Cross fund for Bali victims. The Red Cross promised that this money would be used in providing direct assistance to the victims. However, the Red Cross failed in keeping this promise for only a small portion of the funds was distributed among survivors. This betrayal of the public's trust has destroyed what could have been a pivotal moment in Australia's attitude to giving.
Australians are proud of their reputation for looking after the 'battler'we have all heard John Howard express his compassion for the 'battlers' among us. But this may not necessarily be the case. Compare Australia to America who, by contrast, is perceived to admire the wealthy and mistreat the downtrodden. In reality, however, America gives 1% of GDP to charity compared to Australia's measly .5% of GDPso much for the 'battler'.
Australians have a deeply held view that those in need seek help from the public purse. This is a result of a historically generous welfare system. Governments over the past century have developed systems of welfare for single mothers, the unemployed, disadvantaged, homeless and for those whose parents have died serving the country. Although these schemes are noble and supportive, they have developed within Australians the idea that those in need will always get a crutch from the government. This is not always the case. In the Bali situation, government compensation was barely enough to support victims, some of who needed to purchase limbs costing upwards of sixty thousand dollars.
After the Bali bombings, however, Australians gave healthy amounts of money in a short period of time, which, given the preceding statistic, was highly out of character for the Australian people. As such, the Bali bombing could have served as a turning point in Australians' attitude towards humanitarian causes. The way the Red Cross handled the donated money served to undermine what was a key moment in the Australian attitude to giving.
People today are less likely to answer a distressed scream in a nearby alley, and there is only a slight chance that anyone is going to help you if you are being mugged on the way home from work. Over the past thirty years, our society has become more individualistic and insular. But the Bali bombing changed this. Our attitudes to others changed. We cared more about other peoples' conditions than we usually do, which gave our community a more unified feeling. But this was damaged by the misdoings of the charity that was, for a short period of time, the centre point of this social unity.
In the weeks and months that followed the accumulation of funds, the Red Cross promised that it would spend 0 per cent of the money donated in providing direct assistance to the victims. But only a fraction of the $14 million was administered to victims. $ thousand was used in assisting victims residing in Bali and $. million in Australia. Along with $400 thousand administrative costs and $8 thousand used to fund research for future blast victims, we still have $11 million unaccounted for.
An organisation that has always been a pillar in the area of community service and charity that depends on donations from the public, cannot afford such a fiasco within their organisation. It was incredible that in a world where charities spend fifty to eighty cents of every dollar on advertising and administrative costs so many Australians donated their hard-earned money. The Red Cross is a world-renowned organisation that has, since World War II, helped many people in need. Because of this fiasco it would be surprising if Australians ever donate on such a magnitude again. The Red Cross needed to be more open in telling donors about the funds. To merely shrug off those diligent enough to inquire with phrases like we're still working with the government to allocate funds and the money has nearly run out is simply unacceptable.
The Australian government should have played a role in this fiasco by inquiring into the Red Cross' financial dealings. American state governments keep charity registration records and assess financial dealings of charities at random times during the year. This is done in order to make sure these organisations stick to their charters and keep within the legal limits on the use of donors' money for administrative costs. Ourgovernment should adopt a system similar to the Americans' to make sure such a debacle never happens again. Perhaps a government charity watchdog like this would promote donating by guaranteeing that aid organisations will stick to their mission statements.
The Red Cross' handling of the Bali money has been atrocious and the wider social implications will be more far reaching than anything else. Wounds will heal, compensation will be found. But Australians may never give as much again. This was a pivotal moment in our philanthropic history and it was ruined by an organisation that thousands of Australians trusted. This issue will also damage Australians' trust in other charities. Next time a trust is set up to help blast victims who have lost limbs, or war widows, or even single mothers trying to make ends meet, Australians will be questioning the trust they place in these organisations and questioning the amount they donate.
Phileas Fogg,
Burlington Gardens
Statement of IntentionA piece intended to present a point of view persuasively
The Bali bombings was a devastating event that has affected Australians more directly than any other terrorist attack - which is why it shocked me so that the Red Cross could 'misplace' so much money raised for the victims, in the name of the victims. Furthermore, I felt that this fiasco has undermined what could have been a key moment in Australian's attitude to giving. The Red Cross added revolt to injury.
With this basis and the amount of information in the media, this issue was a perfect one to write a point of view on. Although, my particular piece must be taken in the context of the week or so after the victims appeared in the media demanding money [May to early June] because the Red Cross later responded and somewhat settled the issue of the whereabouts of the money.
This point of view ended up reading like an opinionated editorial you would read in The Age or a subdued extended letter to the editor, also found in The Age; so the intended audience is going to be the same (readers of The Age).
I chose to focus on the social implications of this fiasco, opposed to the human side (which is something that the Herald Sun may concentrate on; not that there's anything wrong with that). No particular persona has been adopted, despite the name at the bottom of the article. Besides, I don't recall a 1th century literary character being the editor of The Age.
Please note that this sample paper on Bali: POV is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Bali: POV, we are here to assist you.Your cheap custom research paperson Bali: POV will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
