Pages

Thursday, September 5, 2019

Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil paper at affordable prices!


A.The problem of Evil


The problem of evil is around us each day and everywhere we go. This is a fact we all have to agree upon. The only question in this matter is how we define evil. Some say evil are the people who do evil actions such as murder and other crimes. Others say that evil Is not only people but also the devil who sends his evil to this world to punish us. There are also people who say that evil can be connected to anything which is bad for the human race such as natural disasters and other disasters we have no control over. The problem with all these three is that they do not explain where this evil comes from. Whether they are right or not is besides the point, as that will be found out if the source of evil is discovered. The second view of evil, the devil, is the one closest to discovering the source. The people who believe in this are saying that the devil makes evil things happen merely either for his amusement or simply because that is what he does, in other words, there is no reason. There is some information in the bible about the devil which could aid this theory. It says that the devil was an angel but was told to leave heven and became the devil after some time, a fallen angel.


Yet this does not explain why the evil exists on earth. This is the problem, if this question is solved, we can begin to understand where the evil comes from and therefore eradicate it from there. Knowledge is always essential for solving problems, which is why it is important to understand.


The third aspect is saying that natural disasters are evil as they harm humans. This can again be connected to Christianity as God punished the people with the flood which created the story of Noah's ark. To be able to answer the problem of natural disasters a Christian should not deny God, but merely understand that a natural disasters is God's punishment to us. It is telling us that we are doing something wrong and we have to solve it. It is a form of punishment, which is not to say that God has hate inside of Him. God is love and this is why we are here. He created us because of His love and His love for us. This means that natural disasters are His way of punishing us. A parent punishes his/her children if they did something wrong so that they understand they should not do the same mistake again, which is exactly what God is doing. The best thing we can do after a natural disaster is to think of reasons why we are being punished, what we could have done to diserve to be punished. If we learn this, we can benefit from the disaster and ensure it will not happen again. Therefore, Christians should not be satisfied by thinking that God has nothing to do with a natural disaster as He is the One who cause them. This is important to remember otherwise one might be confused and perceive otherwise.


Cheap custom writing service can write essays on Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil


Someone who does not believe in a supernatural being could possible believe that we are helpless against a natural disaster, and I believe such a person has the right to think so as he/she does not understand why they happen or what we could possibly do to avoid it happening again. Some people claim that "the universe is brute fact". If this is the case, then it is bizarre how little we know of this facts. The universe is something we are merely scraping on the surface as far as our knowledge is concerned. People claim that is it can all be explained by physics while others say it is unexplainable for the moment. It will remain something we do not have any knowledge about until we are enouigh technologically advanced to travel in space for a longer period of time.


Christians belive that God gave animals verious advantages such as sharp teeth and claws, while humans were awarded with the more advanced brain which enables us to invent machines such as space travelling ships to explore space. There isalso a downside to the brain. Its possibilities can be used for evil purposes, such as creating an Arial race and in the process murdering millions of people. As long as the will of the mind is good, the actions will consequently be good or at least performed with agood purpose.


B. The Psychological approach to Philosophy of Religion


Jungs main idea is that it is impossible for a human to conceive any of the four highest achievements which are faith, hope, love and insight, nor can a human conceive truth that will give the person these four achievements. He continues to say that the achievements are not to be learned and therefore it is not possible to teach them. He also mentions that there is no way to simply give or take them as they are gifts of grace and therefore achieved through experience, which makes them outside of the human reach. This is beacause Jung continues to say that experiences cannot be made but they simply happens in a persons life. We can use discuss these experiences that happened, and in that way become closer to that experience and in a way enable us to reach and understand the experience. These, according to Jung, are the things that brings humans closer to the living experience, but they should not be named methods as they work differently for each individual.Jung mentions his own personal experiences with his patients, specifically on their problems of religion. He says that they lost their religious outlook on life and therefore they will not find peace if they do not regain this. This then means, in my personal point of view, that Jung is saying that if a man loses, or decides that religion is not for him, there is no way that man can find peace again in his life. I do not agree with this, as there are substitutions for religion. In my own personal experience, religion is more effective to find peace than substitutions such as convincing one self that one does not need religion and therby denying ones ultimate inner self. This is beacause if religion is important in ones life, there is no possible way to deny this and if one does, one is deliberately denying the body its, sometimes, most important source of inner peace. There are always the non-believers, the ateists, who claim that they live "normal" lives, however one defines normal. I cannot see this as being true as religion plays a big role in my life, and therefore I could not see myself living the way l do today without it.


Freud is mentioning other points about the importance of religion in ones life which in certain ways differ from those set forward by Jung. Freud claims that the basic problem for humans is that of repressed sexuality, and also how humans mask their true problems with religious doubts. Freud is only interessted in the casual meanings of the sexual symptoms. One aspect which, according to the text, Freud completely overlooks is that of the possibility of the exisitance of the neurosis without any pathological effect until a disturbance occurs. These kind of disturbances are not priamry but merely secondary phenomena. A second thing Freud has overlooked is that of the human difficulty of fighting the unconscious without help. This help is needed, and many people find this help from religion. Freud says that since the beginning of man, we have always looked for some sort of spiritual help. This is because we cannot always understand the un understandable, such as magic and unknown forces. I todays technological world, many of these magical appearances and unknown forces have been explained and understood. Also, it is important to understand and respect other peoples cultures and traditions, and included in this is the religious traditions. This is important, together with the historical aspect of religious activity, as we need to understand the people has always seeked different religions which apply best to each indivisual and his or her believes. Again, this is also important as we need to be able to respect each other if we are to live together in this world. This is my views on different cultures and the way it leads to the understanding and respect of individuation.


C. The Ethical approach to Philosophy of Religion


The message of Christianity is to be good to other people, more specifically, love your neighbour as you love yourself. This means that people should treat each other the way they would want to be treated by others. If one follows this way of thinking, only good actions and good will can come out of this behavious. But there is still the problem of how this is to be done. Some claim that only good actions are deserved to be called good, and therefore only good outcomes deserves the same award. This is argued to be faulty by Immanuel Kant. He claimed that nothing can be called good without proper qualifications, which means that one cannot say that an action is good without proper qualification, except for good will. Intelligence and judgement is not good in it self as the two human aspects can be used in a bad way if the person does not have good will. If a person does not mean well in what he or she does, any quality which was considered good could turn evil and bad. If a person follows Christianity, there is no possible way that person cannot have good will as he/she would want to be treated in the same way he/she treats others, therefore that person would have act on good will.


Religion also fucntions in the way that is promotes peace, once again focusing on Christianity. The word peace can be interpreted in various ways, such as peace of mind for each individual, peace in between people and peace inbetween countries. Christianity fucntions for each of these three aspects. It fucntions for each individuals search for peace of mind, as it allows each person to go to a public building for free and reflect and talk to priests. This tends to promote a calm inner feeling and therfore functions to promote peace of mind.


Christianity, as mentioned earlier, teaches its followers to treat each other in similar ways one wants to be treated by others. This cannot promote anything else than peace as it is very unlikely a man or waman would want to be treated unfairily and therfore would not treat others in such a manner. Therefore it promotes peace between people.


The third aspect, peace inbetween countries, is a bit more complicated, but yet Christianity can be applied to this sort of peace. It involvs more complications as other couintries does not necessarily follow Christianity and therefore could have different viewpoints on peace. It is also a bit more complicated as it is difficult to find direct parts of the Bible applicable to war between countries, even though there are some quanitations.


Law makes are people, according to Kant, people who create laws because they have a will. Since will is nothing more than reason, it is not necessarily a good will. As a reason is very personal, the lawmakers are not acting on the need of society, but merely on their personal needs. If these people are Chrisitans or follow another religion, they would not make laws that people would not benefit from as they would be then treated unfairly and this is exactly what Christianity says people ar enot supposed to do. Religion has a great importance to a religious person, no matter whether the person is an intellectual or a priest. If religion means something important to a person, he/she will carry it with him or herself where ever the person goes and does.


A sexual ethic is something which would depend greatly from person to person as each person has been brought up in different families and have different backgrounds. Depending on the history of a person, that person will have different perceptions about certain issues, such as sexual ethics. Even though this generally applies to most people, there are exceptions. Some people might have been brought up in a strict family with a certain view on life and what is right or wrong, but might still grow up with different views than the family. This is the result of society and the group of people one spends time with. So a sexual ethic is not dependant on the background of people even though it plays a large part. A sexual ethic could be confined to religion. Christianity frowns upon being sexually active before marriage and therefore having children outside marriage. Some argue that this idea has originated from a simple population control instead of a serious sexual ethic. It is more likely that it is a sexual ethic, as it is trying to teach peple how to live their lives.


A.The problem of Evil


The problem of evil is around us each day and everywhere we go. This is a fact we all have to agree upon. The only question in this matter is how we define evil. Some say evil are the people who do evil actions such as murder and other crimes. Others say that evil Is not only people but also the devil who sends his evil to this world to punish us. There are also people who say that evil can be connected to anything which is bad for the human race such as natural disasters and other disasters we have no control over. The problem with all these three is that they do not explain where this evil comes from. Whether they are right or not is besides the point, as that will be found out if the source of evil is discovered. The second view of evil, the devil, is the one closest to discovering the source. The people who believe in this are saying that the devil makes evil things happen merely either for his amusement or simply because that is what he does, in other words, there is no reason. There is some information in the bible about the devil which could aid this theory. It says that the devil was an angel but was told to leave heven and became the devil after some time, a fallen angel.


Yet this does not explain why the evil exists on earth. This is the problem, if this question is solved, we can begin to understand where the evil comes from and therefore eradicate it from there. Knowledge is always essential for solving problems, which is why it is important to understand.


The third aspect is saying that natural disasters are evil as they harm humans. This can again be connected to Christianity as God punished the people with the flood which created the story of Noah's ark. To be able to answer the problem of natural disasters a Christian should not deny God, but merely understand that a natural disasters is God's punishment to us. It is telling us that we are doing something wrong and we have to solve it. It is a form of punishment, which is not to say that God has hate inside of Him. God is love and this is why we are here. He created us because of His love and His love for us. This means that natural disasters are His way of punishing us. A parent punishes his/her children if they did something wrong so that they understand they should not do the same mistake again, which is exactly what God is doing. The best thing we can do after a natural disaster is to think of reasons why we are being punished, what we could have done to diserve to be punished. If we learn this, we can benefit from the disaster and ensure it will not happen again. Therefore, Christians should not be satisfied by thinking that God has nothing to do with a natural disaster as He is the One who cause them. This is important to remember otherwise one might be confused and perceive otherwise.


Someone who does not believe in a supernatural being could possible believe that we are helpless against a natural disaster, and I believe such a person has the right to think so as he/she does not understand why they happen or what we could possibly do to avoid it happening again. Some people claim that "the universe is brute fact". If this is the case, then it is bizarre how little we know of this facts. The universe is something we are merely scraping on the surface as far as our knowledge is concerned. People claim that is it can all be explained by physics while others say it is unexplainable for the moment. It will remain something we do not have any knowledge about until we are enouigh technologically advanced to travel in space for a longer period of time.


Christians belive that God gave animals verious advantages such as sharp teeth and claws, while humans were awarded with the more advanced brain which enables us to invent machines such as space travelling ships to explore space. There isalso a downside to the brain. Its possibilities can be used for evil purposes, such as creating an Arial race and in the process murdering millions of people. As long as the will of the mind is good, the actions will consequently be good or at least performed with agood purpose.


Please note that this sample paper on Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil, we are here to assist you.Your cheap custom college paper on Philosophy of Religion, Problem of Evil will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss.

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss.. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss. paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss., therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss. paper at affordable prices!


Introduction


We live in a changing world.One such theoretical explanation of this change taking place in the late twentieth century was that of the emergence of a risk society.A risk society is characterised by technological and scientific innovation and production, and increasing complexity, resulting in uncertainty, less structured influence and decisions to be made with unpredictable outcomes.'Concepts of risk society…have implications for how we understand…key concepts which underpin social sciences' (Cieslik and Pollock 00), and in particular have a major influence in the field of youth studies.One such concept in the field of youth studies is that of transitions, which has had much debate upon definition and usefulness in addressing youth lifestyles.To address whether this risk society forces a reconceptualisation of youth transitions, I will look at 1) what this risk society actually means and affect it has upon young people, ) the concept of youth transitions, and ) what it would mean for a reconceptualisation of youth transitions, and is this what is actually required.In addressing these core issues I will endeavour to argue that due to these changes in the late twentieth century there does need to be a reconceptualisation of youth transitions, however the major concern is with what this reconceptualisaion actually looks like, rather than whether or not it is inevitably forced.


Risk Society Defined


The closing decades of the twentieth century saw some significant changes take place which had a major impact on society.These changes are being felt, not just on a local level, but a global level also.List changes.Some suggest that these changes illustrate the emergence of a post modern era, others have suggested Post-Fordism, Ulrich Beck rejected the idea of postmodernism and saw the world as moving into a second phase of modernity (Giddens 001677).In this new modernity institutions are becoming global, there is a detraditionalisation of cultural practices, families, employment and social interactions are much more unpredictable, and the old industrial society is disappearing.According to Beck, in place of this industrial society, a 'risk society' is emerging (1), characterised by features which create a sense of, what post-modernists label as 'chaos', Beck would label as uncertainty.Marriage, for instance, used to be a straightforward stage in ones life transition, where as today, divorce rates are high and many choose to live together without getting married, and one must look at the risk, and without certainty of the outcome, make a decision. As science and technology advance with its many benefits also comes its risks 'environmental pollution, food poisoning, anxieties over medical procedures and drug treatments as well as concerns over dangerous transport systems' (Cieslick and Pollock 00), decisions on genetic modification of foods must be made without a clear understanding of what will be the final outcome and so forth.It is in this society of new global risks, detraditionalisation, and increasingly more fluid social interactions that Beck's theory of 'risk society' emerges.


Cheap custom writing service can write essays on Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss.


Beck's risk society can be divided into two 'central interrelated theses', one concerning reflexive modernisation and the other concerning risk (Lash & Wynn in Beck 11).In order that society continues to evolve, the modernisation process must be 'reflexive'.Reflexive in the sense that the risks and hazards associated with the scientific and technological advancement of this second modernity era have never been seen before, and the calculation of such risks can be valued as mere speculation at best.With detraditionalisation and globalisation, the continual development of technology and science, and the breaking down of barriers such as class, race and gender, individuals are forced to become more reflexive in their personal lives, in order to handle the complexities of this modern risk society.In this reflexive modernisation, time and space are no longer bound to a specific place, to face-to-face interaction, or tradition; the internet, global financial markets, the mass media, sporting events etc. all transcend boundaries of past eras.Social relations are no longer bound by locality; expertise is an example of how socials relations are no longer bound by inter-personal ties.In such a world much doubt is created within the individual, and people have 'no alternative but to develop individualised and reflexive approaches to…life…in their search for trust and…security' (Cieslick and Pollock 004)


Beck articulated risk like this 'the concept of risk is a modern concept. It requires decisions and attempts to render the unpredictable consequences of civil decisions predictable and controllable' (Beck 11).Risks do not refer to actual damage that threaten destruction, but rather to a state where the 'perception of threatening risks determines thought and action' (www1).It seeks to articulate that which could possibly happen unless something is done, knowing some empirical informative patterns and relying on uncertain outcomes to make decisions.With the war on Iraq, the pro-war campaigners had acquired certain empirical data and yet had to make a decision within a certain degree of uncertainty, based on what might be the outcome if they didn't act.Risks can now be both local and global simultaneously, and could be seen to be moving away from natural risks, like hurricanes and floods, to man-made risks.Individuals are forced to respond to risks in different ways than seen previously, and young people particularly are faced with many more options; opportunities and hazards, than ever before.


Young Peoples Life Patterns in a Risk Society


The considerable changes that took place within society in the closing decades of the twentieth century, has brought with it many challenges and opportunities for young people.It could be seen that most scholarly work on the area would agree that the changes that have taken place have indeed 'led to a wider reshaping of young people's lives and their transitions to adulthood' (Cieslick and Pollock 008).In a risk society young people's life patterns are forever changing, and becoming far more complex than those of the younger generation.Many 'young people are now…creating their own portfolios in preparation for later life' (Dwyer and Wyn 0015), in reflex to the risks of this new modernity.Where as in generations gone by an employee would keep within the same career path and/or company for life, today young people are being told that majority of the work is short term, and that they must be flexible, ambitious and proactive.Individual lifestyles and behaviour can no longer be predicted by concepts like social class (Furlong and Cartmel 178) and the family.Consequences of the risk society such as the insecurity of employment, changing pattern of family formation, the restructuring of youth labour markets, and the changing shape of education, have had major impact upon the way in which young people's lifestyles are shaped.Young people no longer have their life laid out before them.


Furlong and Cartmel (176) metaphorically illustrate youth lifestyles in the 160s and 170s using a train journey.During school young people board trains determined by structures of class, gender and education, with different trains bound for different destinations.People develop strong ties with those on the same train, sharing similar experiences and journeysreinforcing the class system.Once boarded a train it is very difficult to change course, with little opportunity for change.In risk society, the journey could be illustrated by the closure of railways (set paths for youth to follow) with the individual's destination now reached by car.With the driver able to select their route from a wide range of options, having control over direction, speed and comfort, increasing the risk yet of getting lost and ending up now where, but also opening up a whole new world of options.In this modern world young people embark upon transitions to adulthood that has no certain end point, with many risks and opportunities along the way.With this change in youth lifestyles comes a dilemma in sociological studies, the need to reconceptualize the notion of youth transitions.


The Issue of Definition


As Beck puts it, 'we need ideas and theories that will allow us to conceive the new which is rolling over us in a new way, and allow us to live and act within it' (11). Youth transition can often take on a double meaning.On one hand the imagery of the word 'transition' implies a state of change and progress, where as 'youth' implies a distinct un-moving category.Wyn and White put forth the notion that it only appears that we are dealing with a process of fluid change, but by looking at youth as a transition to adulthood, in reality one only offers a view of youth as a 'steady progression through…stages, to a set end point adulthood' (175), which does not reflect young peoples' experience in this risk society.Youth can be defined differently in different cultures.'In contemporary Western societies the age of our physical body is used to define us and to give us meaning to our identity and actions' (Skelton and Valentine, 18).The defining of this period in life known as 'youth', no matter how it is spelled out, does serve an important function in enabling us to understand some of the issues and complexities in society and social interactions.


Youth Transitions Defined


Most problems arise in representing youth as a transition to adulthood, because of the fact that 'youth' has 'become increasingly fragmented and diffuse' (Wallace, 1817) because of the changes in the last decades of the twentieth century.There is an increasingly diverse range of styles of living, rather than following a setout series of stages and ending up at a particular end-point, a young person today, can pick and choose, ending up at a place that in the past was unconventional, but now very much acceptable.In transitioning to adulthood securing economic self-sufficiency (Cote 00), leaving home, getting married and forming a family, 'may be more problematic at the turn of the 1st century than in previous eras…no modal pattern reflects the experiences of youth today' (Cote 00).The youth experience of transitioning to adulthood is a complex one, with many variables and defining factors.Any representation of youth needs to attempt to take these factors into account, and at the same time, recognize it will fall short and consider the consequences it will have on labeling 'youth' a particular way.For instance, according to Miles, 'young people's experience of life in a risk society is all too often portrayed as entirely negative in nature' (0058), the impact of this needs to be recognised and taken into account.


Reconceptualisation of Youth Transitions Because of Risk Society


Furlong and Cartmel suggest that the changes that have taken place in creating this Risk Society are 'significant enough to merit a reconceptualisation of youth transitions and process of social reproduction' (----6).Steven Miles would agree seeing the problem as


'essentially a conceptual one and that in turn, this problem lies not so much in the study of the subject…youth researchers are generally content to pursue the same methodological and conceptual avenues that they have always pursued.They do not feel the need to address structural and cultural simultaneously' (0065).


Beck would add that 'more urgently than ever, we need ideas and theories that will allow us to conceive the new which is rolling over us in a new way, and allow us to live and act within it' (11).The problem does not lie in the issue of whether or not youth transitions need to be reconceptualized, but rather what the reconceptualisation looks like.The concept of transition 'focuses on the way structures affect how young people grow up', youth studies have a tendency to over-theorize about cultural implications and over-research the structural effects, seeing them as two separate entities, where as young peoples actual experience in contemporary society revolves around the point where they meet (Miles 00010-11).Rudd and Evans suggest that because of the tension between the young person's individual opportunity to shape their route through life, and the 'overarching, often unmediated, influence of deterministic social structures on their lives' (1860), in analysing youth transitions in risk society, there is a need to explain the incompatibility that exists.'The challenge is to try and disentangle agency from structural influences' and to do this one needs 'to follow young people's 'agency' over an extended period of time…look[ing] at both the micro and macro levels and how these impact on students perceptions of their degrees of control' (Dwyer, Peter. et al. 18).


Conclusion


We live in an evolving society in which notions of how society operates and functions will continually need to be reconceptualized, revised and updated.Society operates on many levels.It operates on the micro and macro level, demonstrating the contrast between individual choice and the overarching structures which greatly influence these choices.There are also many varying individual factors that do influence young people, which could never be captured in a theoryby the time it was, society would have changed and the theory would be no longer as useful for changing the present circumstances.It is in this tension that the concept of youth transitions must be reconceptualised.There is no evidence to suggest, from any leading school of sociological thought, that the understanding of youth lifestyles and that transition period that occurs, accurately portrays the true experience of young people today.And I would add that because of the fluid nature of the young persons existence, coupled with the idea that society is continually changing, there will never be a theory which encapsulates all of what it means to be a young person.This does not negate the sociological study of youth, but rather gives perspective.The study of youth, gives us a good reflection of society, and at best, gives us a somewhat limited understanding of social processes and structures, and provides a way forward in this modernisation process.


As a result of significant changes that occurred in society in the last few decades of the twentieth century, society has changed dramatically.The emergence of Beck's 'risk society', in this late modern era, has seen a significant change in the way in which young people live out their lives. Young people are faced with an increasing number of hazards and opportunities, brought about mainly by scientific and technological progress, yet with this progress there is no set path through the myriad of choices, and no guarantee of a fixed destination.The conjecture is not in the notion that perhaps youth transitions needs to be reconceptualised, but rather what this reconceptualisation should look like and whether or not it could truly represent what youth experience in reality.Just as other influential sociological ideas were born out of times of great social and economic change, could this be another?I would suggest that this transition into a new modernity, coupled with Beck's risk society, will result in key sociological ideas being birthed.


REFERENCES


Beck, Ulrich (11) The Silence of Words and Political Dynamics in the World Risk Society.Web page.Retrieved September 1, 00. Available from http//www.logosjournal.com/beck.htm


Beck, Ulrich (1) Risk Society Towards a New Modernity.London Sage


Cieslick, Mark and Pollock, Gary (eds) (00) Young People in Risk Society the Restructuring of Youth Identities and Transitions in Late Modernity.Aldershot Ashgate


Cote, J. (00) Understanding the Prolonged Transition to Adulthood An Empirical Approach University of Western Ontario.Available from http//www.cefu.dk/upload/application/ff564141/james_c_t_1.pdf (Accessed 16//0)


Dwyer, Peter and Wyn, Johanna (001) Balancing Options.London Routledge/Falmer


Dwyer, P., Harwood, A., and Tyler, Debra (18) Youth Research Centre Research Report 17 Life Patterns, Choices, Careers 11-18.Web Page. Retrieved 17 September, 00.Available from http//yarn.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/yrc/publications/text_new/RR17/RR17.0.htm


Furlong, Andy and Cartmel, Fred (17) The Risk Society. Buckingham Open University Press


Giddens, Anthony (001) Sociology.4th Edition.Cambridge Polity Press


Lash, Scott and Wynne, Bryan (1) Introduction.In Beck, Ulrich (1) Risk Society Towards a New Modernity.London Sage


Miles, Steven (00) 'Victims of Risk?Young People and the Construction of Lifestyles'.In Cieslick, Mark and Pollock, Gary (eds) (00) Young People in Risk Society the Restructuring of Youth Identities and Transitions in Late Modernity.Aldershot Ashgate


Rudd, P. & Evans, K. (18) Structure and Agency in Youth Transitions Student Experiences of Vocational Further Education, Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1) pp. -6.


Skelton, Tracey and Valentine, Gill (eds) (188) Cool PlacesGeographies of Youth Cultures.London Routledge


Wallace, Claire (18) Youth in Society the Construction and Deconstruction of Youth in East and West Europe.New York St Martin's Press


Wyn, Johanna and White, Rob (17) Rethinking Youth. Sydney Allen & Unwin


www1 (00).Reflexivity and the Risk Society.Web Page.Retrieved September 1, 00.Available from http//www.bradford.ac.uk/acad/socsci/edocs/ajm-cd-l.pdf


Reflexive…


With the advancement of technology and science new risk situations are being created that are different to previous ages, risks that are hard to measure


What post-modernists label as 'chaos', Beck sees as uncertainty


Just as key ideas in sociological thinking were born in times of significant social and economic change


'Industrial society is structured through social classes while the risk society is individualised' (Lash & Wyn 1)


Ulrich and Risk SocietyReflexive and Risk


http//yarn.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/yrc/publications/text_new/RR17/RR17.0.htm


Risk and panic in late modernity Implications of the converging sites of social anxiety


Sean P Hier. The British Journal of Sociology. Andover Mar 00. Vol. 54, Iss. 1;pg.


(www1) http//www.bradford.ac.uk/acad/socsci/edocs/ajm-cd-l.pdf


Please note that this sample paper on Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss., we are here to assist you.Your cheap custom college paper on Young people's life patterns in a risk society inevitably force a reconceptualisation of youth transitions.Discuss. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Friday, August 30, 2019

Tax Law

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Tax Law. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Tax Law paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Tax Law, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Tax Law paper at affordable prices!


BLO06 Tax Law & Practice


Assignment


Question 1


a) As a result of Joanne receiving $5000 for the cancellation of one of her employment contracts, it is deemed to be ordinary assessable income. The reason that it is ordinary assessable income, is because the payment was for income that Joanne had lost, upon one of her contracts being cancelled. Furthermore, since Joanne also had another employment contract in which she was receiving income, she relied upon those payments to base her lifestyle. In other words, the compensation payment covered the amount that Joanne was going to receive throughout the six month period, even if one of her contracts was not cancelled.


Buy cheap Tax Law term paper


The compensation payment of $5000 was convertible into cash, which further emphasizes the fact that the payment is assessable income, under the ordinary usage of the word. The only time that the compensation payment would not be ordinary assessable income, is under Section 6(e) of the 16 act, as stated by the master tax guide (001,p.47) . However, the tax commissioner would not accept the compensation payment being ordinary income, where the entitlements are placed into a lump sum which will be described as compensation for lost earning capacity, which is also outlined in the master tax guide (001, pp.48-4) . In this case, it would be classified as a capital receipt and not ordinary assessable income.


According to the Core tax legislation (001,p.175) , Section 6.5 of the 17 act, classifies compensation payments as a result of a contract being cancelled, as being ordinary assessable income. However, this particular section does not go into any real detail of defining the term Ordinary Income. Instead, the common law provides grounds as to what falls under the Ordinary Income definition, which is; 'The word income is not a term of art, and hat forms of receipt are comprehended within it…. must be determined in accordance with the ordinary concepts and usages of mankind'. This definition was generated from Jordan CJ, who presided over the case ofScott v Commissioner of Tax (NSW) (15) 5 SR 15 at 1, asstatedby Kobetsky, Dirkisand O'connell (001,p.64) .


An example of a case which supports the $5000 compensation payment that Joanne received as being ordinary assessable income is Californian Oil Products.ltd v FCT (14) 5 CLR 8 ( ATD 10), which is outlined by Kobetsky et.al (001,p.176). Itinvolveda case where the company was appointed to act as an exclusive agent over a 5 year period for selling a particular brand of petroleum products in NSW. It was agreed that the company would not sell a competitor's petroleum products. The contract was cancelled during its first year, and as a result, the company received compensation in ten half-yearly installments. Therefore, the commissioner argued that the compensation payments received were ordinary assessable income. The High Court ruled that the payment was a capital receipt on the grounds that the business was terminated. However, Kobetsky et.al (001,p.176)highlights that their honours rejected this and ruled that the compensation payments as ordinary assessable income, which ultimately agrees with the fact that the compensation payment received by Joanne is indeed ordinary assessable income.


b)Given that Peter was a dairy farmer, the distinction between a capital receipt and ordinary assessable income is related to the effect of the structure ofthe business and that which is part of the product of the structure of the business. According to Sections 70-75 and 70-110 of the 17 act as discussed in the core tax legislation (001,p.7 & 400) , this transaction is deemed to be a capital receipt because the bamboo is not part of the trading stock of the business and the bamboo was removed outside the ordinary course ofPeter's dairy farm business. Therefore, since the facts state that Peter accepted $00 for every truckload of bamboo that was removed, it is a capital receipt.


This scenario is related to the difference between a fruit tree and the fruit of the tree. The fruit tree is known as the structure of the business, while the fruit of the tree is the product of that business structure. This means that the bamboo is a product of Peter's dairy farm business structure. Even though the information largely suggests that it is a capital receipt, further information is needed because it must be known as to whether Peter relied upon the bamboo as a source of earning income under Section 70-10 of the 17 act, despite the definition not including whether a specific part of farmland is trading stock and therefore, being ordinary assessable income. It also must be known that if Peter received the $00 for every truckload of bamboo removed was in the nature of regular and recurrent payments. In other words, if the payments received came on a periodical basis.


However, under Section 6-5 of the 17 act, it states that if Peter had an expectation of payment, then it is likely to be assessable income. An appropriate conclusion cannot be reached as a result of the facts not stating whether the bamboo was used as a source of earning income within the ordinary scope of the business. An example of a case as outlined by Kobetsky et.al (001,p.168), which illustrates the conflict between a Capital receipt and Ordinary assessable income is that of Westfield.ltd v FCT (11) 1 ATR 18. According to Kobetsky et.al (001,p.168) , the structure of Westfield's business was the design, construction, letting and management of shopping centres. Therefore, Westfield purchased a large block of land that was adjacent to one of its shopping centres, so it could be used for future development. Before this was done, Westfield sold its present shopping centre to AMP and negotiations were initiated with AMP over the adjacent block of land.


Westfield generated profit from the sale of the block of the land and the tax commissioner had assessed Westfield on that profit, which the commissioner had classified as ordinary assessable income. As a result, Westfield objected to this assessment, based on the argument that the profit generated, was a capital receipt. Initially, the courts dismissed Westfield's appeal in which the profit was not ordinary assessable income. However, Westfield appealed to the Full Federal court and the Judges unanimously ruled that the profit generated from the sale of the land was a capital receipt. Additionally, Kobetsky et.al (001,p.168)states that the sale of the land did not fall within the ordinary scope of Westfield's business activities or even a necessary incident of their business. During the time that Westfield purchased the block of land, there was no intention to resell the land. As a consequence, the profit that Westfield generated was a capital receipt.


From this particular case, the payment that Peter received for every truckload of bamboo that was removed, it is of a capital nature, as the transaction does not fall within the ordinary scope of his business activities, and prior to the zoo approaching Peter, he did not have any intention to have the bamboo removed from his land, as illustrated in Westfield's case. Even though that Peter is clearly running a business, the bamboo was not used as a means of generating profit as dairy farmer. The only way that Peter could be assessed on the $00 that has been received for every truckload of bamboo removed, was if it was not on a restrictive covenant basis, and if the bamboo was actually used within the day to day runnings of his business.


c)Martha's early retirement package of $47,000 falls under the eligible termination payment (ETP) scheme ofthe 16 act, Section 7B to 7H. Therefore, the eligible termination payment (ETP) scheme qualifies as ordinary assessable income. The reason that the $47,000 early retirement payment package is ordinary assessable income is that under Section 7E of the 16 act, as outlined in the core tax legislation (001,p.788) , the early retirement of employees is an approved early scheme if


-the scheme is offered to all employees within a class that is identified by the employer;


-the scheme is entered into with a view to rationalizing or reorganizing the employer's operations with specific objectives; and


-the commissioner has approved the scheme prior to its implementation.


This means that Martha may have retired voluntarily after working for Ansett for 1 years. As a result, the tax commissioner could treat the eligible termination payment (ETP) scheme as approved early retirement where special circumstances exist, such as where the scheme was introduced because of a delay in processing an application for its approval or it could be implemented without approval, because the employer was unaware of the tax implications. Furthermore, Martha must have decided to retire early, because her employer would not have been aware that when they paid Martha the $47,000, it was not part of her superannuation fund.


Nevertheless, the $47,000 will be ordinary assessable income on the additional grounds that


-if the employer and the taxpayer are not dealing at arm's length in relation to the termination, the ETP must not be greater than an amount which could be reasonably expected to have been paid, if the parties were dealing at arm's length; and


-at the time of termination, there should not be any agreement between the employer and employee to re-employ them after that time, which are all outlined in the master tax guide (001,p.).


Another reason that Martha may have taken early retirement although it has not been specified, could be her age. However the master tax guide (001,p.4), also states that early retirement can also be classified as a bonafide redundancy payment, which means that it is part of an ETP, which is made to a taxpayer, upon employment termination which is greater than an amount, that the person could reasonably expect to have received. This could be as a result of Martha voluntarily resigning.


The retirement payment package would not have been ordinary assessable income, should Martha have been sacked. The word "Redundancy" means where an employer no longer needs the employees to perform a particular kind of work at a certain location. It normally occurs in a scenario where the dismissal has not been caused by any consideration, in which the employee perceives it to be in unusual circumstances. Therefore, it will not extend to an employee being dismissed for personal or disciplinary reasons, or because that the employee was performing inefficiently.


Furthermore, an eligible termination payment (ETP) which is made as a consequence of the termination of a person's employment due to redundancy according to the master tax guide (001,p.4) , must satisfy the conditions that are outlined in the criteria for early retirement scheme payments, before it is treated on a concessional basis. In other words, if the $47,000 early retirement package was made in the conditions that are stated above, then Martha could only end up paying 5% of that $47,000. This is because that the payment was made after the 1st of july 14 as part of the early retirement scheme. This means, that Martha gets to keep 5% of the $47,000 early retirement payment package, and only 5% is ordinary assessable income.


d)Even though that Nigel is an accountant by profession, the payments that he receives through his activities as a keen gardener is enough to suggest that it is generated through providing a personal services business. Therefore, these receipts are ordinary assessable income through Nigel selling roses on a weekly basis and would fall under the personal services income category. Since that Nigel sells his flower bouquets from $0 upwards and in which he would supply 5 or 6 flower arrangements each week, this constitutes that the receipts are received on a periodical basis.


However, the scenario does not indicate whether Nigel relies upon the receipts to base his lifestyle. Given that Nigel is an accountant, it would be deemed that the income in which he receives from that occupation would be relied upon by him. Nevertheless, his receipts from selling flower bouquets is still ordinary assessable income on the grounds that the receipts are received on a regular basis and despite the fact that gardening is a hobby of Nigel's. The additional reasons for the payments being ordinary assessable income, is that it satisfies the criteria that is outlined as being income under the ordinary concept by Kobetsky et.al (001,p.65) , these are


-the income is normally received on a periodical basis;


-the amount must be income in the hand of the taxpayer;


-income must be received by the taxpayer and must belong to them;


-income must be cash or a gain that is convertible to cash;


-the income must be a gain which is realized by the taxpayer; and


-the income is normally derived from the provision of services, as a return from property or from a business.


Inorder to further emphasise the fact that Nigel is carrying on a personal services business, the cases according to common law, which are used to support this argument is Walker v FCT (185) 16 ATR 1 and also Ferguson v FCT (17)ATR 87. In Walker v FCT, Walker was a farmer who intended to breed a special type of goat. Therefore bought an Angora goat in the hope that he would generate a profit from selling the offspring of the goat. As a result, Walker entered the Angora goat industry and set up a small stud farm. However, his activity was not successful as the goat died shortly after only producing two kids. One of them also died without producing. The goat who survived was used to breed offspring and ended up producing two kids. Walker then decided to end his activities after three years and in which he sold the three remaining goats. The only income that Walker received was the Proceeds from the sale of the goats. The court had held that Walker was carrying on a business despite making a loss. However, the court was satisfied that Walker had set up the stud farm with the intention of generating profit, and in which his activities were on a regular basis.


A similar outcome arose in Ferguson v FCT, in which Ferguson intended to set up a primary production business. He entered into an agreement to lease five cows over a four year period. Ferguson also made arrangements with a company for managing the cows over a ten year period. The court referred to Section 6(1) of the 16 act in basing their decision in which the business includes any profession, trade, employment or vocation, but excludes the occupation as an employee. Therefore, Kobetsky et.al (001,p.14) states that the decisions in Walker and Ferguson demonstrate that the courts attached limited weight to the scale of operations upon the determination as to whether a person is carrying on a business.


As a result, the decisions in Walker and Ferguson are enough to justify that Nigel is carrying on a business, by providing flower bouquets on large occasions. The issue of the hot houses also adds more strength to the fact that Nigel has set up these inorder to ensure a year round supply of flowers on his property, to enable him to sell them.


Therefore, Nigel has been carrying on a business through generating income from his hobby on a regular and intentional basis, which concludes that the receipts he receives through selling these flower bouquets is ordinary assessable income, and not a capital receipt.


Question


Given that Paul has started up his own company inorder to work in conjunction with Yoyo Pty.Ltd, it is considered to be an alienation of income. However, under section 87 of the 17 act, the income that Swindon Pty.ltd receives cannot be alienated, due to that income being derived from Yoyo Pty.ltd. Therefore, the $75,000 that Paul's company receives is coming from one single source, which is known as personal services income (PSI). Inorder for Swindon Pty.ltd to be classified as a personal services business (PSB), it needs to be known whether the personal services business is in force, in other words if Swindon Pty.ltd was set up for the sole purpose of undertaking contract work for Yoyo Pty.ltd. Given the facts that are stated in the scenario, this is quite clearly the case.


Even though that Paul's company is clearly a personal services business, it must also be known as to whether that Paul is providing his own equipment under Section 87(18) and where the company's premises is located. For example, whether the company is located at Paul's home or at another location. Also under section 87 of the 17 act, it must also be known whether Paul is employing any other people besides his wife. However, under section 86-1 of the 17 act according to the core tax legislation (001,p.40) , the salary of $40,000 in which Paul receives from the rendering of personal services through his company will be treated as income under the ordinary concept. This is because that according to Kobetsky et.al (001,p.151) , receipts that are connected to the ordinary scope of a person's business is income according to the ordinary concept. This means that Paul's $40,000 salary and the $75,000 that Swindon Pty.ltd receives from Yoyo Pty.ltd is ordinary assessable income.


According to Section 86-1 of the 17 act, this will only be the case when the income belongs to Swindon Pty.ltd and the full amount is not promptly paid to Paul as a salary. Section 86-1 will not apply if the other entity (Yoyo Pty.ltd) is conducting a personal services business. However, there are limits which apply to the entitlement of dedudtions for Swindon Pty.ltd inorder to offset against the $40,000 which is treated as Paul's income. Section 86-5(1), demonstrates the following for the alienation of personal services income, as exhibited by the core taxlegislation(001,p.404)


(Swindon Pty.ltd)


Performance of


the personal


services


Supply the contract Contract Payments


(Yoyo Pty.ltd)


Salary PaymentsOther income


contract distributions


(Paul)


Therefore, Section 86-5() states that it has the effect of attributing thepersonal services entity's income (Swindon pty.ltd), from the personal services to the individual (Paul) who performed these services (unless that income is instantly paid as a salary). There are also certain deduction entitlements of the personal services entity (Swindon pty.ltd) which can reduce the amount of the attribution. Under Section 86-0(!) of the 17 act as outlined by the Core taxlegislation (001,p.405)_,the amount of Paul's personal services income, which is included in his assessable income under Section 86-15 could be reduced by an amount of certain deductions to which Swindon Pty.ltd is entitled. This deduction comprises of the $11,000 in operating expenses which Swindon Pty.ltd has incurred. As a result, the $75,000 that Swindon has received from Yoyo Pty.ltd will be assessable income because Paul dad formed the company for the sheer purpose of performing contract work for Yoyo Pty.ltd.


An example which emphasizes these tax consequences for Paul is in the case ofGP International Pipecoaters Pty.Ltd v FCT (10) 1 ATR 1. This is in which the company succeeded in gaining pipe coating work for the State Electricity Commission of Western Australia (SECWA). As outlined by Kobetsky (001,p.151), , the company was only created for the purpose of performing the contract, and as a result, the construction payments which were received by the company was within their ordinary scope of business. Therefore, the court ruled that the payments were income under these circumstances. This means that under Section 86-15(5) of the 17 act, the $40,000 which Paul has received would be assessable income.


As a result, if the only income in which Swindon Pty.ltd receives is from its contract with Yoyo Pty.ltd, then it is clearly assessable income.


By Adric Limneos


56400


000 Words.


BIBLIOGRAPHY


1.Kobetsky.M, Dirkis.M, O'Connell.A, (001),


Income Tax Text, Materials & Essential Cases, rd edn,


The Federation Press, Sydney.


.Barkoczy.S, (001),


Core Tax legislation & Study Guide, 4th edn,


CCH Australia.Ltd, Sydney.


.Australian Master Tax Guide, (001)


nd edn, CCH Australia.Ltd, Sydney.


Please note that this sample paper on Tax Law is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Tax Law, we are here to assist you.Your cheap custom college paper on Tax Law will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Kino analys

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Kino analys. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Kino analys paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Kino analys, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Kino analys paper at affordable prices!


1.MAN AS PART OF NATURE


Steinbeck was fascinated by natural science. He had taken science courses at Stanford University, had worked in a fish hatchery, and was a good friend of Ed Ricketts, a marine biologist. While studying the shallow waters off the coast of Baja California, Steinbeck witnessed the war for survival among the various ocean species, as well as their many forms of interdependence. He saw striking similarities between human beings and other species.


When you read Chapters III and IV youll notice Steinbecks comparison of a town to a colonial animal. Very primitive single-celled organisms (paramecia, for example) often group together into colonies- sometimes called aggregations- for the purpose of feeding or mating. Steinbeck used this biological aggregation as a model for the social groupings of higher level animals, including human beings. Human society is composed of individuals (like the single-celled animals), whose survival depends on interrelationships. Kino is alone when he finds the pearl, but the discovery of the pearl quickly travels throughout the village- the social, or colonial, animal- which reacts as an entirety with greed, envy, and dreams.


Kino is an impoverished Indian fisherman, but more important is his allegorical role as a man faced with the temptation of wealth beyond his wildest dreams. Because the novella is concerned with Kinos moral obligation and not his civic obligation, it concludes with Kinos casting the pearl back into the sea, a renunciation of material wealth that indicates he has learned a moral lesson. It is important that the novella does not conclude with Kinos arrest or continuing flight from justice, as a realistic novel concerned with civic punishment for ethical transgression might.


Order College Papers on Kino analys


Kino


Kino is at first characterized in very simple terms as a man of few


wants; he is content with his family life, proud of his son and his


heritage, and satisfied with his meager living that provides his


basic needs. Because he is calm and peaceful, Kino lives in


harmony with nature. He enjoys the simple things around him,


including the sounds of the night, the movements of the ants, the


splendor of the sea, his wife lying beside him on the cot, his child


lying in the hammock, and the little splash of morning waves on


the beach. He and his wife have been together so long that words


are unnecessary between them; they communicate their feelings


with signs and music. Kinos music in the beginning is the Song


of Family. He is a picture of total contentment.


To provide for his family, Kino is a pearl-driver. He works hard


each day, weighing himself down with a stone and repeatedly


diving down to an oyster bed. He dreams about finding a large


pearl, but is happy that he can provide food for his family through


his efforts. He is also thankful to have a fine canoe to use in his


work; it has been passed down from his grandfather to his father to


him. Kino values the canoe as a tie to his past and as his bulwark


against starvation.


Kino, though a poor man, is extremely dignified. He is proud of his


past, his wife, his son, his canoe, and his home. He is also aware of


his place in society. He realizes that the civilized world of the


people in town has no place for him since he is poor and


uneducated. He wants to give his son the opportunity to enter this


world and, thus, dreams of his son getting an education and


learning to read. Kino cannot be married in the church because he


cannot pay the priest properly. He cannot get medical help for


Coyotito from the doctor in town because he is poor and cannot


pay the medical fee. In frustration over his situation, Kino bangs


on the doctors gate and hurts his hand. Throughout the book, the


injured hand serves as a reminder of Kinos place in the poor,


native, lower class.


When Kino finds the greatest pearl in the world, he is unprepared


to handle the jealousy and envy generated by his treasure. Kino has


never possessed anything more valuable than his canoe; thus, he is


naive about the reactions of other people to someones wealth. He


looks at the pearl and sees its rare beauty; he also sees it as a


means of providing a proper wedding for Juana and himself and an


education for his son. Other people see the pearl and selfishly want


it to bring fortune their way. The priest sees the pearl as providing


a means for getting the needed repairs for his church. As a result,


the priest, filled with hypocrisy, goes to call on Kino. He tells Kino


to thank the Lord for his treasure and to remember his duty to the


church (the one that has refused to marry him and Juana). Then the


doctor comes to call on Kino and now offers to treat Coyotito. In


order to ingratiate himself to the owner of the pearl, he first gives


the infant a medicine to make him appear sicker. Then the doctor


returns and pretends to cure Coyotito. While at Kinos hut, he tells


the Indian that he is worried about his safety and suggests that he


keeps the pearl for him. Through these two visitors, Kino begins to


understand the envy and evil that now surrounds him.


Next Kino must deal with the pearl buyers, who try to trick him out


of the pearl. In a united front, they all tell him the pearl is


worthless and offer Kino a ridiculously low sum. Kino bravely


stands up against them breaking native tradition, and refuses their


offer. Instead, he plans to leave the security of his home and go to


the capital to sell his pearl. Before he can leave, he is attacked


three times in the darkness of night and is forced to kill one of his


attackers. His canoe is destroyed, and his hut is burned. In spite of


these horrendous events, Kino refuses to part with the pearl. He


still naively believes it is the answer to his dreams and the security


for his family. When Juana tries to throw it back into the ocean, he


wrestles the pearl away from her. In his rage against her actions, he


also hits and kicks the woman that he loves. The pearl is obviously


changing him.


When Kino leaves La Paz with Juana and Coyotito, he feels like a


hunted animal. They travel in the darkness of night and leave false


trails for the trackers who seek them. When the trackers finally


close in, Kino decides to attack them. He stabs two of the men and


fires a rifle at the third. Ironically, one of the stray bullets hits and


kills his greatest treasure, his son Coyotito. Now Kino accepts that


the pearl has produced only evil effects in his life, and he chooses


to get rid of it. After returning to La Paz to bury his son, he and


Juana go to the beach and fling the pearl back into the sea. While


he possessed the treasure, Kino lost the real treasures in his life,


his peaceful lifestyle, his contentment, his appreciation of nature,


his canoe, his hut, and his only son. It is no wonder that at the end


of the book he stands as a bitter and defeated man who feels he has


lost everything.


CONFLICT


Protagonist


The protagonist of the novel is Kino, the pearl diver, and the entire


plot revolves around him. At the beginning of the play, Kino is


described as a simple family man, content with his surroundings


and wanting nothing more than a full stomach and a placid life.


When the scorpion bites his son, he takes him to the doctor. The


doctors curt response and refusal to help Coyotito causes Kino to


search for the pearl. He discovers the greatest pearl in the world,


which seems to incur the wrath of the gods. After finding the pearl,


Kino must endure continuous hazards, which leave him afraid, yet


unrelenting and defiant. Although he fights the evil forces behind


the pearl, he cannot overcome them. He finally loses his most


precious possession, his only son to the evil forces. The novel


comes full circle with Kino flinging the pearl back to the sea from


where it had come. Kinos character as a tough, resilient hardy man


has been beautifully depicted.


Antagonist


Kinos antagonist is the beautiful pearl, which breeds greed, envy,


and evil amongst the people around Kino, who are jealous of his


newfound wealth.


Climax


In chapter six, Kino and his family flee from their country to go


and sell their pearl. Evil trackers, hoping to steal the pearl, follow


them on their journey. Coyotitos cry reveals the presence of Kino


and his family, and the trackers shoot and kill their son. Finally,


Kino hurls the pearl back into the sea.


Outcome


The novel ends in tragedy. After the death of Coyotito, there is


nothing left for Kino and Juana. The pearl has no value to them,


for the main reason for selling it is to provide for their son. Now he


is gone. The novel ends with Kino and Juana returning to their


country, utterly forlorn and defeated. As the entire village follows


them, the couple walks to the sea. There, Kino takes the pearl in


his hand and flings it into the water, where it slowly disappears.


For me, Kino is heroic. He is forced into an adventure (or misadventure) with his discovery of the Pearl of the World -- a discovery beyond anything he could imagine. His love of home and family, however misguided, is genuine.


What makes Kino a modern heroic figure is his lack of a guide or god to intervene on his behalf. Kino has only the ancient songs to direct and warn him. The bravery he possesses is visceral and almost bestial rather than rational and divine. The scene where Kino strips off his clothing to pursue his trackers comes to mind. For him, there is no gift from the gods.


Kino and Juana are wiser at the end of the story when they decide to return the pearl to the sea, but at what personal cost? Steinbeck leaves me with a sense of hopelessness. The Pearl may be a modern parable, but the face of poverty seems all too real.


Kino is a tragic hero whose ruin illustrates the extent to which greed and ambition can destroy ones life. Although he is much wiser by the novels conclusion, he has paid too costly a price.


I dont see Kino as a hero. To me he seemed more to symbolize The average Joe.


Nor do I agree that he paid a price because he was greedy. The things he imagined that the Pearl of the World would bring him were, in my estimation anyway, very humble, modest improvments to his familys quality of life.


Nothing he dreamed of was symptomatic of greed. The greed that was described in this story was exhibited by the doctor, pearl buyers, and whoever it was who hired the trackers.


Kino was not particularly brave either was he? I mean, his struggles with the night visitor, the attacker by the boat, and the trackers were pretty much unavoidable (and self defense).


I think if I ever find a treasure, Ill keep quiet about it. If Kino had not howled in joy at his discovery, no one would have known that there was a pearl to steal. His ignorance of the ways of the world doomed him. He didnt stand a chance.


The narrator says that the story is a parable and, as with all often-told tales, there is only good and bad. This statement prepares us for clear-cut judgment of things to come -- for an either/or type of view of the events yet to happen. The narrator states there is black and white; with no distinction in between. [Thus Steinbeck prepares us for his packaged presentation of good versus evil, and the fact that evil does exist in life in society.]


In chapter one we meet with Kino and his good wife, Juana, both living in a village just outside La Paz, Baja California in Northwestern Mexico. Their lives follow a pattern which is greatly established since they follow the same pattern of life their ancestors led. Juana always awakens before Kino, fans the fire, and prepares the same breakfast. Always the same simple and humble breakfast of corn cakes, for they have not for more. Kino always knows exactly what Juana is doing, even without watching. Juana faithfully goes about her tasks, always humming the same ancient song of her ancestors. [This shows us how unified they are with their past and with their predecessors -- how traditional they are in their ways.] Kino is content with his routine, unbothered at all by it. This all makes him feel satisfied and secure; alive and safe. However, the routine will soon be shattered by the events that follow.


As Kino, before rising, listens to the sound of the waves, he hears the soft and clear Song of the Family. When he goes outside, he hears the same song coming from inside the hut. The song of himself, and Juana, and home, and Coyotito, their baby, all living the same tune, in harmony and balance. These small, early-morning events suggest the UNITY of Kino, his past, and his world -- the WHOLE. When he suddenly sees the scorpion, for the first time he hears the Song of Evil. It quickly drowns out the Song of the Family, and after the scorpion bites Coyotito, the Song of Evil becomes intense and roars in his ears, and indeed in his very head.


Kino and Juana both notice the malignant scorpion at the same time, but it is Kino who too carefully and confusedly tries to knock it off from Coyotitos hanging bed-box. Tragically, as we will see later, he misses it completely. The scorpion lands on Coyotitos tender arm and stings him. Then savagely, but too late now, Kino crushes into the ground, grinding it into a pulp.


Contrary to Kinos harsh attitudes, Juana is the soft answer to the problem. Still following the traditional ways of her people, Juana mixes ancient magic with her prayers as she springs into action, sucking the poison from the wound. Kino, on the other hand, watches helplessly, admiring Juanas strength with awe.


The fat and wealthy doctor, who surrounds himself with all sorts of luxuries, is interested only in Kinos capacity to pay. The obese doctor is in bed eating sweet biscuits and drinking hot chocolate when Kino arrives at his house. The fat doctors servant, also one of Kinos people, relays Kinos message to the doctor. But the doctor is insulted and enraged by Kinos request for help. He says that he has better things to do than to treat Indians. The servant himself treats Kino with disdain as he gives Kino the doctors answer. Only if Kino can pay will he take Coyotito as patient. Of course, unable to pay, Kino takes Coyotito back to the village.


Although it is still early morning, the air is hazy and the sun beats down. Vision is thus blurred, obstructed and impeded. Clarity in perception is lost this way. It is a symbol the author is projecting in the story. A symbol which will keep Kino from seeing things clearly later on. And if it is analyzed more closely, we can assume it is also a form of foreshadowing what is to come -- a bleak and tragic series of events and circumstances.Top


The haze of the early morning magnifies some things and blots out or eliminates others. It seems to make the land almost dream-like, and the main characters state of mind equally dream-like. Vision, therefore cannot and should not be trusted. The physical perception of things is distorted. The people of the Gulf are used to the haze and are accustomed, rather, to trust the things of the spirit and of the imagination rather than of the eye. They are used to relying on instinct and intuition. This is the safe way of life for them. But Kino will soon forget about this and fall into the hands of tragedy and fate.


Kinos most valuable possession is his canoe. The same canoe that had belonged to his grandfather -- who had later passed it on to his father and who in turn had passed it on to him. It represented tradition. It represented the pride which each one took in making a life from the sea and from the capture of fish. It was a means of survival and a source of purpose and unity in the men that owned it. A heritage which held the men together in an ability to deal with the sea. It was a union with nature itself. The canoe had forever been lovingly cared for and preserved, and thus meant everything in the small and humble family. As a tradition, it gave Kino something to live for and be proud of.


Then, while searching in the oyster beds, Kino hears the Song of the Undersea, a mixture of all the songs of his people. Diving into the oyster beds for pearls had for ages been his peoples tradition. As Kino fills his basket, he faintly hears the Song of the Pearl That Might Be. [He senses the possibility of something wonderful this time.] There is a chance that one of the oysters might contain a pearl. Today, the Song of the Pearl grows stronger and stronger, with complete phrases entering the Song of the Undersea. The Song of the Pearl That Might Be drives Kino on today. Kino also knows that Juana is above praying hard for the find of a pearl -- any pearl -- so that they might be able to pay the doctor for Coyotitos cure. [Again we see the closeness between them in this. They are so close to each other they know one another well.]


Juana senses Kinos excitement as he surfaces, but condescendingly pretends to look away. Juana knows that it is not good to want something too much. Pretending not to see the large oyster, Kino first opens a small oyster. Both Kinos and Juanas simple form of life and uncomplicated manner is shown here. Their desire to simply have what they need and be satisfied is also depicted even up to this moment. But soon, very soon, things are about to take a turn.


Kinos anxiousness is secretly hidden behind the fact that he first opens the small oyster and pretends to ignore the very large one. Kino is reluctant to open the large one, afraid that what he had earlier seen when down at the bottom of the oyster bed was only an illusion, a figment of his imaginative head. Perhaps he had not really seen that there was a pearl inside it. Still hesitating in the shy and humble way his people did when they approached a new situation, Juana finally told him to open the oyster.


Then, Kino expertly began to pry and cut the oyster open. And when it was finally vanquished, as Kino lifted the tender oyster flesh, Both he and Juana saw the greatest pearl anyone had ever found. It was the size of a sea gulls egg. Juana reacted with awe and amazement at the sight of the great pearl, perfect and round and silver in the rays of the sun. But to Kino, it was the beginning of a dream-like state, where he first experienced the breaking of the song of victory, only to be swallowed afterward by the intrusion of the desire for things. Things now wanted. His mind began a flow of desires, a flow of dreams of things.Top


It is highly significant at this very point that Juana instinctively should go to Coyotito to examine the wound under the poultice she had made for it, and that she should find that the swelling and harshness of the sting had gone away. She immediately reported it to Kino -- but, Kino did not notice the true meaning of this. He was blinded by the size and worth of the pearl. He was so absorbed by its material worth that he went rigidly into a process of intoxication and possession by the great pearl. He now became possessed by the material significance of the pearl. If Kino had listened to Juana and had truly understood that Coyotito was now safe from the danger of dying, another story entirely different from the tragedy about to happen would have developed. An entirely different route their lives would have taken, and it would have probably preserved their valuable union and happiness. But Kino was now foolishly blinded by the pearl, its size, and its worth among the civilized townsmen in La Paz. He was now in a trance. He was now possessed by the idea that now his family and he could have anything they wanted. Now, he perhaps thought to himself in a millionth of a second, he and his family could be like the rest of the people who had for centuries humiliated him and his people. Now he could be like the white conqueror of his land and no longer need to feel pushed below him. Now he could feel as human as they. But greed is the road to evil, and it only leads to ultimate self-destruction and tragedy. It conduces to evil and the loss of the soul. But... Kino did not know this, for he had never had something like this happen to him before. So, the story continues and we prepare to find out what happens.


The town is described as a colonial animal. The choice of words and analogy here are interesting to examine. Colonial alludes the provincial setting of the events; and animal implies a living organism. But not just an ordinary organism. It has no heart, and no ethics, no moral discrimination, nor conscience. Simply stated, it is not even human. But it does have a nervous system, and a head and other connecting parts. Such that the town and its people serve as a connected living mass, affecting each other, and yet thriving on each in one way or another. Everything is known in the town and everything is monopolized and controlled by those who cooperate with each other jealously to serve as the head of the whole organism. But the additional meaning in this story is that the town equally serves to exploit others like Kino and his people. Anyone who goes there is an outsider, and the animal will treat him as such. All the parts of the animal will cooperate in one way or another to devour the outsider.


In a town, news spreads very quickly -- faster than anyone can even tell. La Paz was no different. Even before Kinos own fellow fishermen all knew about it, the news of the pearl was already in the animals mouths. Kino had found the Pearl of the World. But, as a devouring animal who preys on the smaller and weaker, the town feels that it too wants a share of the wealth of the pearl. Everyone there is now eager to get some of it, or all of it if it be possible. The town is like a scorpion now producing venom and getting ready to strike.


Naive and unaware of the potential for evil in great wealth, Kino and Juana have no idea whatsoever what their unusual discovery has unleashed, liberated. Jealousy, covetousness, desire, greed, and envy have all been set loose about the town. Why should an Indian possess such a marvel when it is only they who can have such things, think the townspeople. The animals appetite is voracious and now wants satisfaction. But Kino and Juana have any idea of what these people can do to get the pearl. They are simple people who have always been condescending and submissive, always giving in to the impositions of the powerful in the town. They do not know any better than to tell all of their discovery. Their simple and uncomplicated minds do not understand the existence of such evil as the one in the ambitious and greedy parts of the voracious animal. They will foolishly exhibit the pearl to all and any who wants to see it. They do not understand the evil that the pearl represents.


Kino sees in the pearl a church wedding for him and Juana, along with fine clothes for the three of them. He sees also a new and fine harpoon made of iron. Then he sees something which at first seems an impossibility but which later lingers in his mind. He sees a rifle, a Winchester carbine. Finally he sees an education for Coyotito. And as Kino told the fellow fishermen in his hut all theses dreams, for the first time in a long time, perhaps, Juana sees Kino with eyes of admiration. She wonders at the great strength which emanates from Kino as he shares his dreams with the villagers.


At first, after having discovered the great pearl, Kino hears the Song of the Pearl, merged, combined with the Song of the Family. When the priest enters into the story, Kino faintly hears the Song of Evil. He suspects of the priests pretensions and attitude, but finds it hard to believe anything evil could be involved with this man who traditionally holds strong influence over his people. Then this song grows stronger when the doctor arrives and almost drowns out and erases the Song of the Family. The doctor lies to Kino about Coyotitos situation and Kino begins to doubt his instincts and allows the doctor to malignantly cheat and deceive him and Juana by giving Coyotito an emetic, a vomiting agent, telling them that the baby will be attacked by the poison in an hour. Kino is still under the spell of ambition and desire. He does not ratify and accept the evil surrounding him and his family now.


After the fat doctor has gone, the sea is described by the author as the fat man sits at his home eating his supper. This time it is the little fish heard as the bigger fish try to eat them. The splashing of their attempts to escape can be heard by the villagers. In other words, everyone will now watch as the town tries to get at Kinos great pearl.Top


An hour or so later, Coyotito really becomes ill , and the first thing Kino believes is that the doctor was right about the scorpions poison. The doctor reenters and pretends to cure Coyotito with ammonia drops in water, but Kino is suspicious of him. When pressed by the fat man for his payment, Kino instinctively looks towards the spot in his hut where the pearl is buried. The doctor now knows where it is, and the scene is set for the oncoming events and tragedies.


When a thief attempts to steal the pearl, Kino is described as he defends his home and the pearl in complete darkness. Never is the thief seen directly by him for there is no light within. Kino is struck on the head by the thief, but he is unconcerned by it. Juana now realizes what has been building inside her is fear. She realizes it is the fear that this great pearl is a source of evil because of the desire it has awakened in the people surrounding them. She tells Kino of the evil that it has brought and describes it as a great sin which should be got rid of immediately. But, Kino is determined now more than ever that the pearl will change their condition and status in the community. He sets himself against the will of the townspeople. It is now also a question of his prideful will against the poisonous will of the town scorpion.


Since the pearl buyers all work for only one man, they will not make any personal profit from the purchase of a great pearl such as Kinos. Yet, they are authentically excited about getting their hands on it. Symbolically here, they are excited about participating in the symbolic hunt to see who gets the prize -- indeed, who gets the quarry. They receive a certain kind of thrill or excitement from the negotiating and bargaining, from the arguing over the price. Seeing who gets the best of the other is what motivates their actions. Getting the greatest pearl for the lowest price possible is now beyond a simple thrill. Escaping from one to the other of the buyers, it almost seems like a mouse trying to get away from the hungry felines. Kino feels thus and decides he is being cheated, for they have agreed not to push up their price.


Even though Kino had been careful to tilt his hat forward in sign of confidence and aggressiveness, it did no good against the conspiracy awaiting him in the town. Before this, the villagers had attempted to pool their pearls together to give to agents representing them. The idea had been to have the agents sell them at the capital for much more than in the town, but the agents had never returned. As Kino walks with Juan Tom s (his brother) to the pearl buyers, they both squint their eyes, just as their grandfathers and great grandfathers had done 400 years before. This simple technique was their only defense against higher authority. It was a sign of defiance of that authority and an attempt to reclaim some of their own. With this defensive physical action they felt better provided for the defense of their rights and interests.


Until this day Kino has marveled at the beauty of the pearl, but he is shocked at its grotesqueness when he looks at it under the magnifying glass offered him by one of the buyers. This is the beginning of its detriment in Kinos eyes, for it will become even uglier later on. The pearl buyers attempt to cheat Kino by trying to convince him the great pearl is nothing but a monstrosity or curiosity. But he returns to his hut greatly bothered. He feels that they are attempting to cheat him out of Coyotitos education and prosperity. He is bothered chiefly also because he has lost his world, but he has failed in achieving another. He is also afraid, afraid of the monstrous capital where he must now go if he should sell the pearl for a more reasonable price. As he stands by the entrance to his hut he can sense the evil lurking out there, waiting to steal the pearl and Coyotitos education from him. But he will not let them. And as Juana quietly watches him, she contributes to his cause by remaining silent and close to him. Next to his side, Juana is courageous by encountering the Song of Evil with her own Song of the Family as she holds the tender baby in her arms. Yet, as Kino announces his determination to go to the capital, Juana tells him the pearl may even get a man killed, and she suggests to throw the pearl back into the sea. Kino tells her to hush, and reminds her that he is a man.


The following morning just before dawn Juana rushes out of the hut in an attempt to throw the pearl back into the sea, but Kino stops her just in time and strikes her and kicks her on the side as she lays on the ground by the shore. Juana remembers that he is a man, brave and aggressive, and resigns to what has happened, knowing also that she is just a woman and in need of a man. Yet, the truth is that their relationship is deteriorating, to the point where she has dared to defy Kinos authority and where he has dared to inflict violence and brutality on her.


Juana believes that men are half madmen and half a god. Men are motivated by courage, reckless pride, and honor. Juana is herself quite courageous but more reasonably so. She acts out of concern for Kino and their son, and she makes decisions intuitively and instinctively. Yet, she serves as a source from which Kino draws strength and courage at times.


Returning to the hut herself, Juana finds the pearl behind a stone, glittering in the momentary moonlight, for all was still very dark. Then she finds two figures on the sand. One is a dead man and the other is the unconscious Kino. As he had returned to their hut, Kino had been attacked another time by thieves seeking the pearl. In his defense, Kino had slashed his knife out and killed one of the attackers by cutting his throat open. Juana now realizes that they must leave. It will do no good to try to save themselves by explaining the death was caused in self-defense. But Juana also realizes that their happy, normal way of life has all been lost.


Kino agrees after her persuasion and decides to get the canoe ready, but is enraged when he sees it had been previously damaged by the thieves. It had a great hole at the bottom of it. He is enraged because he feels that the murder of a boat is less than of a man since a boat has no way of protecting itself. But the truth is that Kino realizes they have shattered his heritage, his inheritance from father to son -- they have shattered his past, present, and future. Indeed, they have also shattered part of himself.


So reverent is Kino of something so personal as a canoe, that he does not even think of taking one of his neighbors canoes. Things again might have turned out differently if they had done so.


As Kino turns from the beach to return to his hut, he suddenly realizes there is a devouring fire burning down their hut. Juana rushes to him with the baby in her arms and says the dark ones set fire to the place while she was still in it. [It is interesting to notice in the novel how Steinbeck, along with all the other extremes, manipulates and exploits the light with the dark. In this part of the story, everything is darkness and they can barely make out the things happening in fragments. The figures of the men marauding their place inclusive are only dark figures. There is never any identity involved. It is anyone and at the same time everyone from the town. No one is to be trusted, and all are to be feared as a source of impending destruction.]Top


As Kino and Juana quickly move away from their flaming brush hut, they seek shelter in Juan Tom ss place, where they find Apolonia, Kinos sister-in-law. There they find refuge until evening time comes around, time for them to flee. Juan Tom s contributes to their safety by diverting the neighbors attention with stories of Kinos flight to the south, and at the same he asks to borrow things that Kino will need some beans; rice; and a long eighteen-inch knife. Kino tells his brother that now he must keep the pearl more than ever because it is now his misfortune -- indeed it has even become his soul. Meanwhile, the winds of the day which have made it unsafe for the boats to go out have also foreshadowed the impending danger and tragedy of the story. Additionally, the same winds will favor Kinos flight because they will erase the familys tracks, making it difficult for anyone to pursue them.


When they first set out to escape the evil of the great scorpion, the society of people they now fear, Kino hears a triumphant Song of the Pearl, again mixed with the Song of the Family. But then later when he looks at the pearl, the music suddenly becomes sinister and menacing. In the pearl he looks for his rifle and instead sees the dead body of the man he killed; and instead of a church wedding he sees Juana, beaten and dragging herself home; and instead of an education for Coyotito, he now sees the babys feverish face. Yes, the song has become threatening now.


Then, as he sleeps in the thin shade of the brush, for the weather here is hot and dry, Kino suddenly awakens as if fighting with someone. Juana says it was only a dream. But Kinos awakened primitive instincts, like those of a hunted animal, lead him to see in the distance the figures of the three men following him. One of them, the rich controller of pearls, is on horseback, while the other two are bent to the ground searching for traces of Kino and his family. It is interesting to note how Kinos wilder instincts have resurged and now come into play -- thus also making him more equal with his pursuers. In the town he was totally underneath, so to speak; but here, in the wild of the desert and in flight from his pursuers, Kino has been raised to a certain equality by the awakening of his instincts and more savage heritage. The trackers are expert in finding their prey, he realizes. These are the trackers from inland where there is little to eat, unless they learn to track down their prey. But now, he and his family are the prey. The music of evil grows stronger still as the trackers approach. It becomes secretive and poisonous as his pounding heart gives it rhythm.


The trackers come up to the very bush where Kino is hiding, but then they continue moving ahead on the road Kino has been using to move north. Now Kino is in a panic and decides to move away from the road and into the mountains. But his fear makes him consider giving up, to which Juana reacts with objective reality, telling him the men would kill him in any event. Sure that the trackers will eventually find their tracks, Kino does not even bother now to try to erase them. They must get to safety first, and head for the mountains. The music of evil sang loud in Kinos head now.


On their way, Kino proposes he go on by himself and Juana and the baby hide, but Juana refuses to leave him since they must stay together. Juanas courage motivates Kino again and gives him new strength. He intelligently zigzags and leads an irregular path, so as to confuse the trackers and make them lose time.


By the time the sun is going down, they come to a pool where water falls from the mountain top. They stop to cool down and quench their thirst. Then Kino spots the two experts far into the distance and realizes they will be there by nightfall. After examining the terrain, Kino finds a series of small erosion caves only thirty feet above. They were very shallow, but he found one they could use. The trick now was to remain ever so quiet when the trackers got there. The baby had to remain silent, too.


By sundown the three men were there by the place where Kino and his family had been. They noticed the tracks leading up to the next bank on the mountainside that Kino had purposely left, and decided to camp here below. At night Kino decided that the best thing to do was to get the man with the rifle first, and then he could deal with the other two. The night was dark and the moon had not come out yet. As Kino crawls slowly downward, and as he prepares to attack, the music of the enemy almost disappears, and in its place, the Song of the Family becomes fierce and sharp driving him down on the dark enemy courageously.


The hand of fate comes into plain view now. As Kino is close to the watcher and ready to spring into feline action, there is suddenly a cry from above, exactly from where Coyotito and Juana are hiding. The man with the rifle turns and one of the others says it could be a mother coyote with her pup. An amazing symbol used by the author here. The man aims to shoot towards the cave as Kino jumps into action. Kino kills the man with the long blade in his feline hands, but not before the man is able to fire the rifle. Then he deliberately strikes the head of the second man with the rifle itself and then deliberately aims at and deliberately shoots the third man. He finishes him off by deliberately shooting him between the eyes. [It is interesting how Steinbeck here contrasts the first killing with these. The first was unintentional and in self-defense, but now it is entirely deliberate and purposeful.]Top


The conclusion to the story is interesting in many regards. The novel had opened up with the beginning of a new day. Now, Juana and Kino come back to the town when the sun is about to set. Juana no longer follows Kino as was their usual habit and custom. Now, Juana and Kino walk side by side. There is change in both of them -- this can clearly be seen. They are now partners in life -- partners in death. Coyotito is dead, as his little body is limp in Juanas shawl and on her back. They are now united in death by the very death of Coyotito, who had been killed by the bullet that was aimed at an unseen coyote in the darkness of the night. Kino and Juana both walk into the town withdrawn from reality and from living experience, for they have suffered the greatest loss any man or woman could possibly experience. The fatigue and the emptiness on their faces seems almost magical to the townspeople. In Kinos ears the Song of the Family was as fierce as a cry. It had now become his battle cry. His and Juanas world had been totally destroyed now. The union that once was, with Coyotito, is no longer. The world had become totally blurred to them. They saw nothing. No town, no people, not a single thing. There was only one mission left in their wearied minds. They were headed for the place where it all began. They were headed for the beach of that great ocean.


Once they had reached the waters edge, Kino took out the pearl and looked on its surface once again. But this time it was no longer beautiful. It was gray and ulcerous ... like a malignant growth. And in it he saw the light of burning fire; the terrified eyes of the man at the pool; Coyotito lying in the cave with the top of his head shot away. The music and the song which it emitted was now distorted and insane. Kino took it and flung it with all his might into the distance of the ocean under the setting sun.


Juana


Juana is Kinos wife, his helpmate, his strength, and his anchor.


Juana is the perfect wife, who considers her husband to be the most


important person in her life. She always is awake before her


husband in order to prepare his breakfast, tend to their child, and


look after her family with total devotion. She is loyal,


hardworking, strong, uncomplaining, and almost subservient in


carrying out her domestic duties. When tragedy strikes, she is


levelheaded. When the scorpion bites Coyotito, Juana takes charge


of the situation and hustles her husband and child to the doctor.


When her husband is attacked the first time by people seeking his


pearl, she realizes the destructive powers surrounding the pearl and


suggests that Kino get rid of it. When he is attacked the second


time, she takes matters into her own hands, finds the pearl, and


attempts to toss it back into the gulf. Her effort is stopped by Kino,


who seizes the pearl from her and in a rage, strikes her to the


ground and kicks her. She accepts the punishment in a sheepish


manner, for she has never needed to stand up to her husband


before. But when he punishes her, she accepts that the pearl is now


part of their existence.


Juana, like the other Indian folk, is quite superstitious. When the


scorpion bites her son, she offers incantations to the gods that


ironically ends with a Hail Mary. When Kino comes out of the


water with the oysters, she persuades him not to open the biggest


one first, for it might seem that they are too eager and, thus,


displease the gods. But Juana uses her primitive knowledge to the


advantage of the family. When Coyotito is bitten by the scorpion,


she places a poultice on his shoulder to help the swelling abate.


When the evil forces attack her husband, she knows how to clean


his wounds and gives him a soothing native drink.


Juanas courage, loyalty, determination, innate ability, and strength


make her an interesting character and wonderful wife for Kino.


•KINO


Kino is an honest, dignified pearl diver who works hard to support his family. He is a simple and natural being who functions well in the traditional ways of the village. Kino is conscious of his poverty and knows that money could buy things he lacks. He hopes to find a pearl that will guarantee him future peace. Like most human beings, he wants to get ahead.


Kino depends on nature for his income. When the waters are rough, he cannot go diving. When the sun sets, his workday ends. The discovery of a great pearl changes Kinos life. The man who usually hears the Song of the Family- the harmonious, soothing message that all is well in life- begins to hear the voice of suspicion, the sounds of danger- the Song of Evil. This song is really a powerful internal voice that he hears when danger arises, which links him to his ancestors as a sort of built-in protection against death. It is Steinbecks poetic way of referring to Kinos survival instinct.


On the other hand, Kinos intelligence and growth in social awareness help him realize that he and other Indians have been exploited by the rich and powerful. At first, instinctively, he senses the danger with the doctor and pearl buyers, but it is only after his brutal encounter with the trackers that he becomes aware of the extent of this exploitation. He comes to realize that human beings will kill in order to gain money and power.


As Kino moves away from his natural habitat, he becomes isolated. With the pearl in hand, he marches toward the city- a symbolic move toward a more complex civilization- in his belief that he can deal with civilized people. He lays claim to the benefits of civilization- power, money, an education for Coyotito- but soon realizes, when pursued by the trackers, that he is a victim of the very society in which he hopes to earn a profit. Some readers believe that Kino brings about his own downfall by going against the forces of nature. What do you think Kino should (or could) have done with the pearl? What do you think the end results would have been?


Kino loses more than his social innocence in the novel. He learns that he, too, can kill to protect his chance for wealth and power.


If the characters in The Pearl are symbols, what does Kino symbolize? Some readers say that Kino is the exploited but innocent man who loses his innocence when he tries to venture beyond his social boundaries. Others see Kino as the symbol of an honest, hard-working man destroyed by greed. Still others see him as a man unable to escape his fate.


•JUANA


Juanas relationship to Kino, her husband, is made clear in the first chapter of The Pearl. She is a loving and devoted wife, the stabilizing force in Kinos life. At first you may see her simply as subservient. But Juana has great inner strength and determination. For example, when Coyotito is bitten by the scorpion, Juana acts immediately and sucks out the poison. She also insists that they see the doctor- an unheard of event in the village.


Juana has a strong survival instinct where her family is concerned. When the doctor refuses to treat the baby, Kino responds by ineffectually punching the gate; Juana puts a seaweed poultice on the babys shoulder. She responds with the same kind of direct action when she decides that the pearl is a threat to her family. She tries to throw it back in the sea.


If you are trying to decide what each character represents, you could say that Juana represents the integrity of a simple way of life. Throughout The Pearl, Juana appears to be in tune with nature and aware of what will save her family. Unlike Kino, who dreams of a new life, Juana does not believe in pursuing the unattainable.


1.One of the most important themes in The Pearl is that of Kino and Juanas struggle for survival. Even though their way of life may differ from yours, it contains the same kinds of struggles that everyone faces at some time- the struggle for food and shelter, and the struggle to fight off attacks from nature (the scorpion) and from other human beings, who burn their hut, destroy their canoe, hunt them down, and kill their child.


.Some people believe that human beings are never really free, because the course of their lives is determined by outside forces. Others insist that each persons life is formed by a series of choices.


Some aspects of Kinos life are, of course, determined for him. His race and social status are two examples. But other elements are the direct result of his actions- his determination to keep the pearl, his decision to go to the capital, and so on. Are Kinos decisions made freely, of his own accord, or are they based on factors beyond his control?


What does the end of Kinos story say about his ability to control his destiny? Is the finding of the pearl a quirk of fate? Without it, would Kino have any choices to make? All these questions may help you think about the role of choice in your own life, as well as Kinos.


More than anything, Kino wants money so that he can pay for his sons education, purchase a rifle, and provide economic security for his family. But Kino never has the chance to find out if money buys happiness. Instead, he learns that the pearl is more of a curse than he can handle. The pearl, like an evil magnet, attracts a host of greedy people, and the only way for Kino to escape these people is to get rid of the object they seek. Kino discovers that wealth and good fortune are beyond his reach.


The critical situation that Kinos family faces is significant to show the great importance of the fortune that Kino will receive, for it provides not only the possibility of material goods but may buy the life of his child. Kinos encounter with the doctor sharply illustrates this, as the doctor essentially allows Coyotito to die because Kino cannot pay for treatment.


Please note that this sample paper on Kino analys is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Kino analys, we are here to assist you.Your persuasive essay on Kino analys will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!